Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
like how they only used four screws to attach the z-mount lens mount to the camera body, while the other brands used five or six screws? Large-aperture super-telephoto lenses such as the FE 400mm F2.8 G Master™ OSS and FE 600mm F4 G Master™ OSS are highly acclaimed by sports and wildlife photographers around the world for their outstanding resolution and autofocus (AF) performance, as well as being remarkably lightweight. The new lens will feature the incredible high-resolution and spectacularly beautiful bokeh true to Sony’s acclaimed line of flagship G Master™ series lenses, while also offering a far-reaching 300mm focal length and F2.8 large aperture. This combination will deliver a new elevated shooting experience for all professional sports, news and event photographers and videographers looking to capture decisive moments with higher image quality. The foot of the tripod collar is strong and supported the lens well. It has a 1/4 20 hole so it easily mounted onto a tripod shoe. The manual focus ring is a fantastic size. I had to use it at one point when shooting handheld and in a low light situation where focusing was really tough.
300mm F2.8 DG OS HSM | Sports - SIGMA Corporation 120-300mm F2.8 DG OS HSM | Sports - SIGMA Corporation
In conclusion, I really like this lens, very competent for the price and a sleeper in this segment in my opinion.Solid construction and pretty good optics, too. IQ and sharpnes pretty good wide open, and very good from f3,5 onwards. Pixel peepers may be able to find some minor purple fringing in areas of extreme contrast. But this is really insignificant, and can easily be corrected in post processing, should it be noticeable. AF works well thanks to the speed of the lens. Also with Sigmas 1,4 x and 2 x teleconverters. As usual, there is some loss of image quality, especially with the 2 x TC. The Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 DG OS HSM Sports lens is the first telephoto lens produced by Sigma as part of their Sports ("S") series lenses under their new Global Vision strategy. Serving as a replacement for the previous model, the Sigma 120-300mm ƒ/2.8 EX DG OS HSM APO, the new lens features redesigned mechanics and exterior construction. It's also heavier than the previous model, weighing in at around 8 lbs. with the hood and tripod foot attached, compared to the 6.5 lbs. of the old version. It's also slightly larger in length and width. Even at f16 this lens still delivered loads and loads of gorgeous bokeh when the subject was at the the closest focusing distance of 250cm / 98.4″. f32 It has got to be worth a look? Especially as it is cheaper new than a USED Canon 300mm F2.8 IS Mk1 as well as being cheaper than the Sigma 300mm F2.8. Now your just contradicting yourself, first mirrorless ain’t necessary smaller as it has much to do with generation, then someone show that the 120-400 is latest generation Nikon and suddenly Nikon made an old generation in 2020 and those can make it much smaller. Contrary to any sort of evidence of the matter.
Sigma 300mm f2.8 EX - The Phoblographer Sigma 300mm f2.8 EX - The Phoblographer
other brands have closed lens mounts with zero to little 3rd-party lens support, and they have the dismal market share and lost press agency contracts that prove how poorly they are managed.First I am comparing against the Canon lenses. The Canon 300 II has no equal IMO. Rarely use the Sigma lens now. This is a detailed review of the Sigma 2.0x Teleconverter EX APO DG for the Nikon mount. I had a chance to test out this teleconverter, along with the 1.4x Sigma teleconverter when working with the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 lens, so I wanted to share some of my findings and compare the teleconverter to its Nikon counterpart, the Nikkor TC-20E III. In this review, I will go over the optical characteristics of the Sigma 2.0x teleconverter and talk about its performance when using both Sigma and Nikon super-telephoto lenses. Sports shooters may object to this lens not having Optical Stabilization. Gear Used 300mm , f2.8, 1/320sec,ISO 200 The lens collar is a nightmare to use – rotation is anything but smooth. Shifting from horizontal to vertical was quite painful, especially when compared to Nikkor super teles. Additionally, while it is a nice feature that the collar/foot assembly can be removed (Nikon 200-400 cannot be removed), it cannot be done with a body attached, which significantly diminishes the convenience of that feature. And because the rotation of the collar is related to the removal of the collar, I was constantly worried about it coming off while shooting and shifting between horizontal and vertical orientation, although that was possibly just down to paranoia and unfamiliarity on my part.
Great Deal 
New Comment